A little bit of violence and personal summary sharing: whether the front row is a diamond hand and whether a token can take off in the second stage may not have much to do with it Last year, when I was doing address screening, I paid the most attention to the "diamond lot" indicator, which was the average profitability of the token and the number of days held in the position, which proved to be one of the most suitable indicators at that stage in November last year Then this year, it is basically impossible to see a single token profit of a thousand times the address (a hundred times is rare, more markets are two stages back to a medium market capitalization, and then start a small dozens of times So I tried to use the "front row diamond hand" degree to see if it can be used as a sufficient condition to find a suitable target in the second section, and the specific algorithm is also very simple. Top Row Diamond Lot = Number of Position Days× Position Amount/Total Position Amount of TOP100, Diamond Lot Rate = Front Row Diamond Lot / Number of Days of Token Creation The number of days of holding is directly used by OKX's holding time data API, and then if the tokens are from the same address, the number of days from the distribution address is obtained, and the same API from OKX is obtained and verified with another data Then using these two data, I observed more than 100 tokens with a market value of 100M-100 million, among which the more famous ones are $LABUBU $XBT these Not to mention a bunch of data in the middle, in the end, it turns out that the degree of diamond hands in the front row is not related to whether the token can take off in the second stage, and many of the tokens that have taken 30%-50% of the chips that have been drilled to zero have been lying in the position of hundreds of thousands of market capitalization